header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014 / Penny Bygrave , Michael Twomey
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

I give you his word

web_twomey_2

Penny Bygrave & Michael Twomey examine instances of potential liability

In Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie- Grant, Earl of Seafield (Scotland) [2014] UKSC 9, [2014] 2 All ER 270 Sandy Lewis, an employee and chief executive of the defendant trust, caused an e-mail to be delivered to Alistair Erskine referring to a moor’s estimated grouse population. The e-mail contained implied false statements of fact that amounted to misrepresentations; the figures were extrapolated from counts relating to certain parts of the moor and were not representative of the moor as a whole. The Scottish lower court did not find fraudulent misrepresentation. Erskine subsequently decided to use a new limited liability partnership to enter into a lease of the moor. Discussions continued between Lewis and Erskine, who was then acting as agent of the LLP. Some weeks after the e-mail, the lease was eventually signed on behalf of the trust and the LLP.

In the Scottish Court of Session, the Lord Ordinary, Lord Hodge, found that Erskine was the directing mind and will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll