header-logo header-logo

19 May 2016
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hunting cases to continue

The RSPCA will continue to prosecute Hunting Act breaches and instances of animal cruelty where necessary, the charity insists.

In line with the recommendations of the 2014 Wooler Review, which the charity has been implementing for the past 18 months, however, it will refer cases to other prosecuting authorities first. Jeremy Cooper, chair, hit the headlines this week after accepting that the charity had “got the tone wrong sometimes”.

However, the charity denies media reports that it is no longer going to pursue prosecutions against hunts, and says it is simply implementing the Wooler recommendations. It points to a statement it put out in December, in which it explained: “Following an independent review of our prosecutions work RSPCA trustees agreed to pass cases involving traditional hunts to the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to prosecute, following initial investigation to determine the quality of the evidence.

“Cases involving potential farm prosecutions will be passed to the relevant authority, such as Trading Standards. However in both instances, we reserve the right to proceed with such investigations if either the police, CPS or Trading Standards decline to take the matter up.”

The RSPCA has come under fire in recent years for being over-zealous in its actions and for bringing politically-motivated prosecutions, notably spending £327,000 on a case against the Heythrop Hunt in the prime minister’s constituency.

Issue: 7699 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll