header-logo header-logo

Humble opinions

23 June 2011 / David Smith
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert evidence must distinguish fact from opinion, says David Smith

There is an important distinction made between types of evidence in England and Wales—witness evidence that relates to fact and evidence that relates to opinion. The first is admissible while the second is not. The distinction is often hard to spot.

In truth, all evidence is opinion evidence to some extent in that the same events may appear to occur in an entirely different manner due to a difference in the way they recall or interpret the events, or because of a conscious or unconscious bias. The court resolves this problem by grouping issues of interpretation and bias under the general heading of witness credibility.

Opinion v fact

For example, a passenger in a car cannot give factual evidence about the speed that the car is travelling unless they have actually looked at the speedometer. They can give factual evidence about how frequently lampposts were passing the windows and as to how the car was moving in relation to other vehicles on the road,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll