header-logo header-logo

Human tissue—Property—Right of possession

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

CM v Executor of the Estate of EJ (deceased) and another [2013] EWHC 1680 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 148 (Jun)

Family Division, Cobb J, 14 June 2013

The Family Division has an inherent jurisdiction to authorise the removal, storage and use of a deceased’s human tissue samples, and may do so in order to ascertain whether the deceased had in fact been suffering from any serious blood-borne illness that might have been transferred to a person treating the deceased shortly before the death.

James Berry (instructed by RadcliffesLeBrasseur) for CM. The first respondent executor and the coroner were neither present nor represented.

The applicant, CM, was a medical doctor, a consultant and professor at one of London’s principal teaching hospitals. In May 2013, she was driving home, off duty, when she saw the body of the deceased, EJ, lying motionless on the pavement. EJ was seriously injured and had bled profusely. CM performed emergency first aid on EJ but the latter died at the scene. In the course of the resuscitative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll