header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Right to respect for private and family life—Gypsy

Buckland v United Kingdom (App. No. 40060/08) [2012] ECHR 40060/08, [2012] All ER (D) 141 (Sep)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Lech Garlicki, President, Nicolas Bratza, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Ledi Bianku, Nebojša Vucinic, Vincent, De Gaetano, 18 Sep 2012

The inability of a gypsy to challenge the decision to seek a possession order on the basis of the alleged disproportionality of that decision in light of personal circumstances was in breach of Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), though subsequent legislative changes remedy the breach.

The applicant was a gypsy. A claim for possession was issued against her and her family in August 2005. At first instance, the judge considered whether the applicant could challenge the making of a possession order. He concluded that he was bound by previous authority (including Kay v United Kingdom (App No 37341/06)) to find that the only possible challenges to the making of the order were to the law itself or on conventional judicial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll