header-logo header-logo

27 June 2012
Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

How to manage ABSs?

SRA's management of ABS process in doubt

Commercial law firms have expressed a lack of confidence in the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s ability to process alternative business structures (ABSs).

Nearly half (49%) of 100 commercial firms responding to research on the changing legal market, commissioned by law firm Fox Williams and undertaken by legal research company Jures, said they were “not confident” in the SRA’s ability to successfully manage the ABS application process.

Seven ABSs have so far been licensed by the SRA since the January launch—delayed by three months from its original October 2011 due date.

However, the research, ABSolutely fabulous—a study of ABS, indicates this low-profile start should not be dismissed. Four out of 10 commercial firms have changed their management strategy in response to the Legal Services Act, which permits ABSs, and 14% of the firms have already changed their partnership structure.

More than half of the respondents described accessing private equity or other third party investment as either a “compelling” or “very compelling” reason for ABS conversion.

On the other hand, “loss of control” and resistance from partners were identified as the biggest barriers to conversion.

Tina Williams, senior partner at Fox Williams, says: “The possibility of using the ABS model as an opportunity to refinance firms to enable growth or better to facilitate survival in a newly competitive environment is clear to see from our research.”

Issue: 7520 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll