header-logo header-logo

How clean is my title?

06 November 2009 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7392 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Andrew Francis explains how to clear off troublesome covenants

Take three cases.

First, your client is holding a site ripe for development in suburbia. But for the credit crisis, your client would have built and sold six houses on it and be sitting on a tidy profit. But the land is subject to a density covenant in favour of land retained by the former owner.

Second, your client is a rich investor snapping up small development sites held by developers who need to offload them and one site has covenants on it. These appear to impede profitable development, but because of historic breaches they may no longer be enforceable.

Third your client is a college which needs to expand its facilities on land affected by covenants. A local action group threatens to enforce them.

How should these three parties be advised? In the first two instances no-one has obtained planning consent, due largely to the cost of securing it. All advice must be given with an eye to the fact that money

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll