header-logo header-logo

How to avoid getting into serious trouble!

18 September 2013 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

HH Simon Brown QC continues his exclusive NLJ online series on costs management post-Jackson

Civil litigation lawyers who have recently returned from their well-earned long vacation will have been stunned to read their LexisNexis alert about the “Plebgate” libel case involving Andrew Mitchell MP and News Group Newspapers.

At the case management conference (CMC) at the beginning of the long vacation, Master McCloud ruled that Mr Mitchell will only recover his court fees of £2,000 in costs from the defendants if he is successful in his £150,000 (maximum) libel action against them and will, therefore, have to bear his own lawyer’s costs of £500,000 leaving him (or perhaps them) £348,000 out of pocket.

This will, no doubt, strike experienced returnees as bizarrely unfair, but how did it happen? Quite simply, he and his solicitors had failed comply with the rules (CPR 3.13) and an order made about the filing his costs budget about costs budgeting.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll