header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house fee success

In-house lawyers are celebrating victory in their long-running campaign to reduce the cost of their practising certificate fees

Earlier this month, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) confirmed the level of practising certificate fees. Solicitors will pay £428, while law firms will pay a separate rate calculated by turnover.

In-house lawyers will be exempt from the firm-based part of the levy, a move acknowledged by the SRA as more accurately reflecting the cost of regulation and is therefore fairer.

John Bleasdale, chairman of the Commerce and Industry Group (C&I), an organisation for in-house lawyers across the UK, said: “This marks the culmination of an eight-year campaign in which we have lobbied extensively for reform, so that the proper costs of regulation are borne where most appropriate, and are proportionate, fair, and justifiable to members. We are delighted that the SRA has accepted our submissions by making our members only responsible for the individual element.”

He said the new regime would be welcomed by corporate employers in the current economic climate.

Issue: 7430 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll