header-logo header-logo

03 March 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7736 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

House of cards

nlj_7736_dobson

Nicholas Dobson explores the public sector equality duty in relation to homelessness

  • Substantial but incomplete overlap exists between those having priority need for accommodation under the Housing Act 1996 and those with public sector equality duty (PSED) protected characteristics

The ancient Roman poet, Horace, once referred to the “discordant harmony of circumstances”. Some might think this aptly describes the relationship between the public sector equality duty (PSED) in s 149 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and local authority homelessness duties in Pt VII of the Housing Act 1996 (HA 1996). For although as recent decisions indicate, these provisions do and must work harmoniously together, they can also raise complexities for local authority housing officers having to make tough on-the-ground decisions in difficult and sensitive situations.

A case in point was the 17 January 2017 decision of the Court of Appeal in London Borough of Hackney v Haque [2017] EWCA Civ 4, [2017] All ER (D) 68 (Jan). Briggs LJ gave the leading judgment with which Beatson and McCombe LJJ agreed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll