header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

Homelessness fears as eviction ban ends

MoJ easing emergency measures this month

Lawyers have called for early provision of legal advice and warned of increasing cases of homelessness as the pandemic stay on evictions is lifted.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) ended its ban on evictions on 31 May, and will ease emergency measures this month. On 1 June, notice periods reduced from six to four months for most tenants. On 1 August, notice periods for cases where there is four or more months of unpaid rent will reduce to two months. Landlords are required to give 14 days’ notice before an eviction can take place.

However, research suggests at least 350,000 households who rent privately may find themselves in trouble. A November 2020 Citizens Advice survey, ‘Citizens Advice coronavirus data report’ (bit.ly/3fIHOsR) of 6,000 adults in the UK, including 1,300 who rented in the private sector, found nine per cent of those renting privately were currently in arrears (compared to three per cent in the year 2019-2020, in a government survey).

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘Legal advice must be available to all tenants facing eviction from their homes, no matter the circumstances surrounding the eviction, particularly when homelessness is a likely outcome.’

As part of its response to COVID-19, the government introduced a housing possession mediation pilot scheme on 1 February 2021, providing free, independent mediation between landlords and tenants.

Boyce said: ‘The earlier the advice can be received the better.

‘While all efforts should be made to keep tenants and landlords talking and to ensure court litigation is undertaken as a last resort, caution should continue to be exercised around replacing legal advice with mediation. While the cases of COVID-19 have significantly reduced, the economic impacts of the pandemic continue.

‘A balancing of tenant and landlord rights, therefore, needs to continue to be undertaken.’

Issue: 7935 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll