header-logo header-logo

14 April 2025
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

HJA founder, solicitor & leading justice campaigner leaves firm fighting fit

Patrick Allen, senior partner at Hodge Jones & Allen (HJA), will retire this year after 48 years at the forefront of social justice law.

The firm, which Allen co-founded with Henry Hodge and Peter Jones in 1977, eight months after qualifying as a solicitor, now employs more than 250 people and is renowned for its work in multiparty actions, medical negligence, housing, civil liberties, family, human rights and criminal and protest law. To mark its launch from offices on Camden High Street, Hodge framed a £5 note which he received for his first fixed fee interview. However, the note was later stolen by a criminal client.

Allen, who is an NLJ columnist and a former president of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (2003-2004), specialises in complex personal injury and multi-party cases.

Allen is due to formally retire on 30 September.

He said: ‘As anyone who runs a law firm will know the economic headwinds, legislative change and financial pressures never abate, so to have stayed the course delivering the same work over almost five decades speaks volumes about our commitment to helping people in often unfashionable areas of the law.

‘Over the years we have also helped over 300 lawyers to qualify. It has been my great privilege to act for so many amazing clients and work with dedicated and brilliant colleagues.’

After retiring, he intends to focus on the Progressive Economy Forum, a thinktank he founded, as well as family, travelling, windsurfing, skiing, vegetable growing and piano playing.

Allen was inspired to become a lawyer after seeing a friend wrongfully arrested and charged by the police at a demo in 1971, and later acquitted in court. He gave evidence at the trial.

He went on to represent clients in several high-profile actions during his career, including those affected by the King’s Cross fire in 1987 and UK veterans bringing Gulf War illness claims. Other notable work included the New Cross fire inquest, the MMR and Sheep Dip multi-party actions and the Marchioness litigation.

He was a deputy district judge, from 1998 to 2014.

From 2003 to 2005, he acted for several of the women who had been incarcerated as slave labour workers in the so-called Magdalene laundries and who have since been awarded compensation by the Irish government. He was also instructed by the Bridgewater Four in their miscarriage of justice claim against the Home Office.

More recently, his firm led the successful ten-year-long campaign on behalf of the mother of Ella Kissi-Debrah, who was the first person to have air pollution recorded as a cause of death on her death certificate and reached an undisclosed settlement with the government.

His firm has also represented claimants at public inquiries into the Grenfell Tower fire, undercover policing, the Post Office scandal and the Lampard inquiry into mental health deaths in Essex.

From 1 October, HJA will be run by the firm’s existing management team, led by Chun Wong, head of dispute resolution and Julie Hardy, director of finance.

Issue: 8113 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll