header-logo header-logo

08 July 2016
Issue: 7707 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hillsborough team wins LALY award

The legal teams who acted for families of 96 Hillsborough victims received an award for outstanding achievement at the Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year Awards (LALYs) this week.

More than 60 lawyers from six law firms and six sets of chambers acted in what was the longest inquest in British legal history, lasting over two years, and involving a million pages of evidence. The jury ruled in April that the fans had been unlawfully killed, and were in no way to blame for the tragedy.

Among those picking up the award was Terry Wilcox, of EAD Solicitors, who told the 500-strong audience that he could easily have been “sitting on the other side of the courtroom” as his brother was a survivor of the 1989 disaster.

Patrick Roche, of Garden Court Chambers, says: It was a unique privilege and a pleasure to work collaboratively with all of the family teams to achieve our common goal of achieving justice for the 96. The jury's clear conclusions not only created legal history at the end of the longest inquests ever held, but delivered long overdue justice for the families of all those who were killed on that horrific day in April 1989.”

Baroness Doreen Lawrence, who presented the awards, likened the situation of the Hillsborough families to that of her own her family after her son, Stephen, was murdered in a racially motivated attack in 1993.

“It is so important to us to have support from legal aid lawyers. Without that, families like ours would never have got justice,” she said.

Ruth Bundey from Harrison Bundey, said the inquest verdict was not the end of it for the lawyers: “We look forward to prosecutions and new legislation—and real justice for the 96.”

The Hillsborough team included lawyers from Bindmans, Birnberg Peirce, Butcher & Barlow, Broudie Jackson Canter, Doughty Street Chambers, EAD Solicitors, Garden Court, Garden Court North, 1 Gray's Inn Square, Harrison Bundey, Mansfield Chambers, and 4 Paper Buildings.

The other prizes went to: Darragh Mackin, KRW Law (legal aid newcomer); Lou Crisfield, Miles & Partners (social & welfare lawyer); Baljit Bains, Wilsons Solicitors (family legal aid lawyer); Tracy Winstanley, Heaney Watson (family mediator); Elizabeth Callaghan, Dere Street Barristers (legal aid barrister): Philippa Curran, Odonnells Solicitors (mental health lawyer); Clare Jennings, Matthew Gold & Company (children's rights); Simon Creighton, Bhatt Murphy (public law lawyer); Simon Natas, Irvine Thanvi Natas Solicitors (criminal defence lawyer); Anti Trafficking & Labour Exploitation Unit (legal aid firm/not-for-profit agency); and Crowdjustice (access to justice through IT).

Issue: 7707 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll