header-logo header-logo

Hilary Term 2010

13 May 2010 / Oliver Gayner , Hugh Tomlinson KC
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Hugh Tomlinson QC & Oliver Gayner assess the Supreme Court’s Hilary Term

In Hilary Term 2010, the Supreme Court heard fourteen appeals and gave fourteen judgments. But the biggest news story concerned events—or rather non-events—outside the court room. The Supreme Court began and ended its second term of operation with eleven justices. The mysterious “twelfth justice”, who originally appeared on the court’s lists as “Justice X” failed to appear, being replaced at the last minute in each of the cases. It was not until a week before the end of term, on 23 March, that Downing Street announced the appointment of Sir John Dyson as “Justice 12”. This announcement came exactly eight months after the announcement that Lord Neuberger was to be appointed as Master of the rolls.

There has been a good deal of speculation as to why the process took so long, and what was going on behind the scenes. Attempts have been made to identify all kinds of skulduggery and back stairs jockeying for position. None of these have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll