header-logo header-logo

13 May 2010 / Oliver Gayner , Hugh Tomlinson KC
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Hilary Term 2010

Hugh Tomlinson QC & Oliver Gayner assess the Supreme Court’s Hilary Term

In Hilary Term 2010, the Supreme Court heard fourteen appeals and gave fourteen judgments. But the biggest news story concerned events—or rather non-events—outside the court room. The Supreme Court began and ended its second term of operation with eleven justices. The mysterious “twelfth justice”, who originally appeared on the court’s lists as “Justice X” failed to appear, being replaced at the last minute in each of the cases. It was not until a week before the end of term, on 23 March, that Downing Street announced the appointment of Sir John Dyson as “Justice 12”. This announcement came exactly eight months after the announcement that Lord Neuberger was to be appointed as Master of the rolls.

There has been a good deal of speculation as to why the process took so long, and what was going on behind the scenes. Attempts have been made to identify all kinds of skulduggery and back stairs jockeying for position. None of these have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll