header-logo header-logo

18 March 2010 / Adam Chapman , Andreas White
Issue: 7409 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

High stakes

When can employees expect to benefit from legal representation? Adam Chapman & Andreas White report

As is widely known, employees who reasonably request accompaniment at a disciplinary hearing have a statutory right to be accompanied by a colleague or trade union representative (Employment Relations Act 1999, s 10). While in serious cases employees often request legal representation at disciplinary hearings, such requests are rarely granted. In light of recent Court of Appeal authority (R (on the application of G) v X School and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1), employers will need to consider this issue more carefully. In some cases of sufficient gravity, employees will have a legal right to legal representation at disciplinary hearings. 

G was a teaching assistant employed at X school when a complaint of sexual misconduct was made against him. The governors of the school carried out an internal investigation and conducted a disciplinary hearing, following which G was dismissed for abuse of trust. G was not permitted legal representation at the hearing. He appealed, and requested legal representation at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll