header-logo header-logo

09 August 2007
Issue: 7285 / Categories: Legal News , Environment
printer mail-detail

High Court knocks back BAA injunction bid

News

Mrs Justice Swift has struck out BAA’s application for a sweeping injunction under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 against Airport Watch, an umbrella organisation supported by the National Trust and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, which between them have five million members.
She found no evidence that members of the Heathrow Association for the Control of Aircraft Noise and the No Third Runway Action Group supported or planned any direct action, and ordered BAA to pay the legal costs of those groups.

She did, however, grant BAA a civil injunction against three individuals and a protest group called Plane Stupid. The injunction covers the land inside the airport boundary and BAA buildings directly linked with the airport’s operation.

Justice director Roger Smith says: “BAA has been high handed and somewhat ill-advised. It was little less than bizarre not to have liaised with Transport for London when BAA’s demand was for an injunction which specifically covered the Piccadilly Line. There must be some questions about the competence of that decision.”
 

Issue: 7285 / Categories: Legal News , Environment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll