header-logo header-logo

20 May 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7699 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The heartache of Hillsborough

nlj_7699_robins

Jon Robins reports on the long struggle for justice of the victims & survivors of the 1989 tragedy

For all the coverage of the Hillsborough tragedy since last month’s inquest verdict, it is easy to overlook the horror of the day. Daniel Gordon’s two-hour documentary Hillsborough, shown on BBC2 earlier this month, was a harrowing and timely reminder of the scale and terror of what happened on 15th April 1989. Fans, families and the police spoke of the Lepping Lanes crush in horrific and unsparing detail. “It was like looking at fish in a trawler net,” one officer said.

Then there was the horror of a cover-up fully exposed in the inquest verdict of “unlawfully killing”. “The price of Hillsborough isn’t reducible to 96 people dying,” Professor Phil Scraton said. “The price of Hillsborough is the price of institutional injustice.”

That reflection came at the point in the film covering one of the lowest points of the Hillsborough campaign, the failed private prosecution of the match commander David Duckenfield and his deputy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll