header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Harkins loses ‘final appeal’

Phillip Harkins, who is accused of committing a fatal gun robbery in Florida in 1999 when he was 20 years old, has lost his final appeal in one of the UK’s longest-running extradition battles.

Harkins has always denied being involved in the shooting of Joshua Hayes. After being released on bail and returning to the UK in 2002, he was convicted and imprisoned for dangerous driving that resulted in a woman’s death in a car crash. The US authorities then sought his extradition for the murder of Hayes, leading to an unprecedented legal battle that went to the European Court of Human Rights twice. The court ruled this week that Harkins’s Art 3 rights would not be breached if he was imprisoned for life without parole.

Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh, solicitor, Corker Binning, said: ‘Mr Harkins has reached a point, after 14 years, where the legal avenues available to him have been exhausted.

‘Unless he or his legal team can find cogent and compelling new evidence with which to launch a fresh challenge, this will bring to an end one of the longest extradition battles in UK history, and Mr Harkins will be put on a plane back to the US.

‘The decision regarding the inadmissibility of Mr Harkins’ claim does not in itself come as a surprise. The court will only hear the same appeal again if different grounds are relied upon, or if new evidence can substantiate an existing ground in a way which is materially different to previous attempts.’

Reece-Greenhalgh said the court had noted that there is a system in Florida whereby clemency can be granted. In a separate case, Vinter & Ors v UK, in 2013, the court decided that in order for a life sentence not to constitute inhuman and degrading treatment, it must include at least the possibility of review and release.

Issue: 7754 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll