header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Harbottle to pop cork

News International investigators must disclose “exact remit”

MPs have asked law firm Harbottle & Lewis to publicly disclose the “exact remit” of its help with an investigation into phone hacking at the News of the World.

Harbottle was previously bound by client confidentiality from addressing comments made about the firm by News Corporation chief executive, Rupert Murdoch. However, News International has now given permission for the firm to respond.

Replying to a letter from Keith Vaz MP, chair of the home affairs committee, this week, Harbottle outlined its ability to disclose information. It said: “We believe we are free to explain the position in general terms, without commenting on all the circumstances in question.”

Vaz responded by asking the firm to disclose the “exact remit” it was given when instructed by News International in 2007.

In 2007, Harbottle was hired by News International to review internal emails after the News of The World’s royal editor, Clive Goodman, and private investigator, Glen Mulcaire, were imprisoned for phone hacking.

News International representatives subsequently told a Parliamentary inquiry that Harbottle had reviewed internal emails and found no additional illegality.

Former director of public prosecutions Lord McDonald, who has been asked to review the Harbottle file of emails, told the Commons committee of culture, media and sport that the file did suggest wider criminality.

Meanwhile, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has launched a formal investigation into “the role of solicitors in events surrounding the News of the World phone hacking crisis”.

An SRA spokesperson said: “The investigation is currently in the early stages and the first step will be to obtain the necessary evidence to ensure a thorough investigation, using the powers we have under the Solicitors Act 1974.

“The investigation will be resourced by as many people as is deemed appropriate. It is impossible to give a timeline and it would be inappropriate to give any further detail at this stage.”

The Law Society has also called for action on a separate issue—that of solicitors who believe they have had their own phones hacked.

The Society has been contacted by several solicitors who have been notified by police about possible hacking activity. Des Hudson, chief executive, said he was writing to Lord Leveson—the judge conducting the inquiry into the hacking scandal—to ask him to investigate.

“Hacking into solicitors’ phones would be very serious indeed, and we urge the police to carry out a full investigation,” said Hudson.

Issue: 7476 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll