header-logo header-logo

Guardianship v adoption

23 March 2007 / John Mitchell
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

John Mitchell compares recent developments in guardianship orders with the current rules on adoption

Since December 2005 courts have been able to make special guardianship orders (SGOs) under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 14A. These give former foster parents, relatives and others what the white paper, Adoption, A New Approach (2000) Cm 5017 described as “clear responsibility for all aspects of caring for a child” and a status greater than that provided by a residence order but less than adoption.

The Court of Appeal has recently provided guidance on how the new powers should be used. The SGO is intended to build what the white paper called “a legally secure, stable permanent placement”, in part by restricting the exercise of parental responsibility by the child’s parents and requiring them to obtain the leave of the court before applying for any s 8 order other than a residence order. A strong message from the Court of Appeal is that the issue of whether or not to make an SGO is of “fundamental importance”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll