header-logo header-logo

Great expectations

02 March 2012 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Theo Huckle QC calculates future loss of earnings under Ogden 6

The Ogden Tables (6th Edition) —used to calculate future loss of earnings—included a methodology for computing future loss of earnings or earning capacity based upon the gross multiplier for the remainder of the claimant’s working life. They also apply reduction factors to that multiplier which vary according to:

  • whether the claimant had and now has a “disability”;
  • whether the claimant was and now is in employment; and
  • the educational attainments of the claimant.

There is no doubt the computation suggests that the future earning capacity of persons with disabilities is more restricted than has historically been assumed.

Unsurprisingly, judges have concerns in applying the Ogden methodology as to possible overcompensation. Defendants habitually contend a case is not appropriate for the application of that method, urging the court to consider the case one of “too many variables” as in the Blamire line of cases— and thus apply the (cheaper) Smith v Manchester basis of award.

Generally, the courts have shown themselves prepared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll