header-logo header-logo

Great escape

26 June 2008
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

In brief

Despite finding that the Law Society had not handled complaints against solicitors properly, the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner has decided not imposed a fine but said that this was, “not a cause for celebration”. The Law Society was found to have missed five of the 13 targets set by Zahida Manzoor relating to timeliness, quality and use of resources. The commissioner said: “The number of older cases has reduced substantially and complaints are being handled more quickly. This is good news for the consumer and this upward trend needs to be sustained and improved upon”. Manzoor warned that improvement was required on those targets relating to adherence to quality processes.

Issue: 7327 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll