header-logo header-logo

08 July 2015
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance surgery , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Government curbs MIB powers in uninsured driver claims

The government has announced major reforms to the compensatory protection for victims of motor accident victims.  A new Uninsured Drivers Agreement 2015 will come into force on 1 August 2015.

The Department for Transport says that it is working on a new Untraced Drivers Agreement and it is likely that this will involve further consultation.

Solicitor Nicholas Bevan, who has campaigned for extensive reform of the compensatory safeguards for motor accident victims, welcomed the news.  Bevan has written extensively in NLJ, arguing that wide ranging reform is necessary to bring them into line with the minimum standards of protection required under European law.

Bevan says: "The new Uninsured Drivers Agreement is a significant improvement on its predecessor, unfortunately the 1999 Agreement, with all its defects and vicious strike out clauses, will continue to apply for all accidents that predate 1 August 2015.

The good news is that the new agreement is shorter, simpler and less unjust to accident victims. The Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB) has been stripped of many of its powers to reject legitimate claims for trivial procedural infractions. 

"For example, the minister has removed the need for the MIB’s detailed and arcane procedures by the simple expedient of making it obligatory to join the MIB as a party in any action.

"Unfortunately the new agreement contains a number of serious breaches of European law that favour the interests of insurers at the expense of accident victims.”

The government’s proposals for revising its statutory provision following the Court of Justice’s ruling in Damijan Vnuk v Zavarovalnica Triglav C-162/13, last September, is still awaited.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll