header-logo header-logo

Going and staying

07 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Can the court make a suspended order for possession of a dwelling by consent...

Can the court make a suspended order for possession of a dwelling by consent when a mandatory ground has been relied on by the landlord? If so, is there any restriction on the period for which a warrant of possession may subsequently be suspended?

The answer depends on the correct interpretation of s 9(2) and (6) of the Housing Act 1988. It may well be that the original order can be suspended by consent and remains valid until amended or varied on appeal in which event it will be deemed to have been made on a discretionary ground (the court being presumed to have acted lawfully) with the result that the court has a discretionary power to suspend the warrant. An alternative approach at the outset would be for a mandatory outright order to be made against an agreed undertaking by the landlord not to enforce on terms which could give rise to a contract claim by the tenant if breached.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll