header-logo header-logo

05 June 2015 / Andrew Skelly
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Getting it right

nlj_7655_skelly

It’s never too late to ensure that statutory procedures have been followed, says Andrew Skelly

Where an issue going to the jurisdiction of a first instance tribunal is raised in proceedings before it, or where the same tribunal itself identifies such an issue, it is entitled to investigate it and to determine it.

The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 introduced a right for leaseholders of flats to take over management of their block via an “RTM company”. The company may serve a claim notice on the landlord, who may then serve a counter-notice (either admitting the company’s entitlement to acquire the right to manage, or alleging that, by reason of a specified provision of Ch.1, the company is not so entitled).

Fairhold

In Fairhold (Yorkshire) Limited v Trinity Wharf (SE16) RTM Co Limited [2013] UKUT 0502 (LC) the leasehold valuation tribunal (LVT) held that the freeholder was restricted to arguing only those grounds set out in the counter-notice. On appeal the tribunal held that: “Section 84 does not provide that if an application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll