header-logo header-logo

Getting equal: more work to be done

01 September 2020 / Amandeep Khasriya
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Features , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail
26327

In brief

  • Inequality rooted in bias.
  • A commitment to transparency.
  • Building a more equal society.

While we may be celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Equal Pay Act this year, it is vital we now look to the future and understand the need for change. The legal profession needs action, not promises.

In May 1970, the Equal Pay Act gained Royal Assent following a women’s strike in a Dagenham factory. This was a landmark moment in the history of women’s rights, enshrining in law that men and women in the same job are to be treated equally, in terms of pay and the conditions of their work.

While there has been tremendous progress, it is important that the legal industry recognises how much more work there is to be done for true equality to be realised. Women have waited long enough for equal pay and, without proper change, it will take decades to close the pay gap.

This starts with transparency. Equal pay—as set out in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll