header-logo header-logo

GCHQ surveillance?

07 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MP & Peer launch proceedings against government

Green Party MP Caroline Lucas and Baroness Jones have launched legal proceedings against the government over alleged surveillance by GCHQ. They claim their communications are being intercepted as part of the Tempora programme exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The unusual proceedings have been launched at the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Leigh Day solicitor Rosa Curling, representing Lucas and Jones, will argue that the alleged interception breaches the Wilson Doctrine—that there should be no interception of communication sent to or from MPs unless there is a national emergency.

 

Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll