header-logo header-logo

14 November 2014
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Gavin Llewellyn—UIA

gavin_llewellyn_photo

Stone King lawyer elected head of international legal commission

Stone King commercial lawyer Gavin Llewellyn has been appointed president of the Intellectual Property Commission of the International Association of Lawyers (UIA) at the UIA’s recent Annual Congress in Florence, Italy.

Gavin is a senior associate in Stone King’s corporate and commercial team who specialises in intellectual property (IP) matters. He speaks regularly on IP law at conferences organised by the UIA which promotes professional excellence among the world’s lawyers.

The organisation brings together over 2,000 individual members and 200 bar, federation and association members from more than 110 countries. The IP Commission comprises about 200 lawyers from all over the world. It arranges seminars on IP law at the Annual Congress and during the year, sometimes in conjunction with other commissions with an interest in IP.   

Gavin’s expertise covers a broad range of IP rights with a particular focus on brand and design protection and exploitation, and on helping clients deal with contentious issues and business risks related to IP. He advises clients in the areas of copyright, design rights, trade marks, passing off, database rights, domain names and the developing law of privacy and confidence, as well as risks arising from the use of social media.   

Gavin, who is a fluent French speaker, is also a member of the UIA’s Fashion Law Commission and Computer Law Commission.

“It’s a great honour to have been appointed a commission president of this important and respected international body,” Gavin says. “Intellectual property rights are essential for most businesses and need to be understood and protected. I look forward to working with colleagues from around the world to exchange knowledge and to promote greater understanding of this complex area of law.”

Issue: 7631 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll