header-logo header-logo

09 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Future Bar training

While the Solicitors Qualifying Exam has stalled, the Bar Standards Board (BSB) is forging ahead with discussions on how to train the next crop of barristers.

Last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority extended this month’s deadline for its decision in principle—the details are due to be ironed out at a later stage—on whether to introduce the exam. It will now take a decision in spring 2017, with the exam not in place until the 2019/2020 academic year at the earliest, if it goes ahead at all. Its proposals have so far been met with fierce opposition from universities and training providers.

Over at the Bar, however, three options for qualification have been proposed. The “evolutionary” option focuses on liberalising the training and increasing flexibility but would otherwise keep the qualification route as it is. The “managed pathways” option would keep the existing route to qualification but add three other routes: combined law degree and vocational training; vocational training programme integrated with pupillage; and a modular approach where candidates commit to training one step at a time. The “Bar specialist” option proposes a qualifying exam, open to any candidate—successful candidates would then undergo a training course shorter than the Bar Professional Training Course.

Next month, the BSB will host a debate, The Future Bar Training. Guest speakers will give presentations on the possible options. Register your interest for the event on 7 July at futurebartraining@barstandardsboard.org.uk.

The BSB will launch a consultation later this year, with a view to implementing the changes from the 2018-19 academic year.  

BSB director of education and training, Dr Simon Thornton-Wood, says: “By introducing a more flexible route to qualification, we hope to ensure future access to the profession in a way that enables candidates from all walks of life to consider a career at the Bar. The future of Bar training should ensure it produces competent barristers, and ultimately a legal system in which a diverse public can have confidence.”

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll