header-logo header-logo

Friends of the earth?

13 August 2009
Issue: 7382 / Categories: Legal News , Environment
printer mail-detail

An attempt to claim the government failed to implement its fuel poverty strategy has failed in the Court of Appeal.

 An attempt to claim the government failed to implement its fuel poverty strategy has failed in the Court of Appeal.

In Friends of the Earth and Ors v Secretary of State for Energy [2009] EWCA Civ 810, the charity claimed the government had a duty to meet its targets on eradicating fuel poverty whatever the cost.

The government said it faced budgetary constraints because of rising fuel prices.

The Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000 requires that government strategy must “specify a target date for achieving the objective of ensuring that as far as reasonably practicable persons…do not live in fuel poverty”.

Much of the debate before the court centred on whether the phrase, “as far as reasonably practicable”, implied a duty on the part of the government to try to reach, or to achieve, targets.

In his judgment, Lord Justice Kay said: “Until recently, one would not have expected legislation to impose upon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll