header-logo header-logo

08 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Fraud & the justice system

The Justice Committee has issued a call for evidence on the criminal justice system’s approach to tackling fraud, which accounts for about half of all crimes

The committee will look at how fraud is investigated and prosecuted in the courts, including the roles of the Crown Prosecution Service and Serious Fraud Office, the experiences of those working in the legal system, plans to tackle online fraud, and problems with evidence and disclosure in the prosecution of fraud. It aims to hold formal evidence sessions in the new year.

The majority of fraud occurs through the use of digital technology, which means it can be perpetrated from other countries, and is estimated to cost the UK more than £137bn per year. The first half of 2021 saw a 285% rise in online fraud such as phishing and text scams, fuelled by the increased use of online platforms during the pandemic.

Committee chair Sir Bob Neil MP said: ‘The ever-increasing use of online platforms, particularly during the pandemic, has seen a huge increase in cases of fraud while making it easier for criminals to operate across borders. ‘

However, Louise Hodges, head of criminal litigation at Kingsley Napley, warned ‘quick fixes are tricky’ and solutions would require investment.

‘Several different agencies have been focusing on this area in recent years and the increase in online fraud has already featured in many reports and action plans,’ she said.

‘Yet we have seen a reduction in regional and local fraud squads with specialism in lower level of frauds lost and investment in expertise to combat online fraud not keeping pace with the reality. It is sustained and meaningful investment to keep pace with the criminal community and to bring perpetrators to justice that is required.’

Reply in no more than 3,000 words by 17 January through the online portal.

 

Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll