header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / Mariko Wilson , Kim Beatson
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Foreign affairs

Mariko Wilson & Kim Beatson examine financial relief following marital breakdown in an overseas jurisdiction

By virtue of Pt 3 of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (MFPA 1984), English Courts have the power to grant financial relief where a marriage has been dissolved or annulled or the parties have been legally separated in an overseas jurisdiction. The dissolution, annulment or legal separation must, however, be recognised as valid in England and Wales before MFPA 1984 can be invoked.

Part 3 of MFPA 1984 remedies the potential hardship suffered following an overseas divorce by enabling the Court to make Orders for financial provision including property adjustment, pension sharing, Orders for sale, interim Orders, avoidance of disposition Orders and transfers of tenancies.

Considerations for the Court

Before making any Order for financial relief, the Court has a duty to consider whether in all the circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate for such an Order to be made by a Court in England or Wales. The Court should also have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll