header-logo header-logo

Force of nature

02 June 2011 / Alison Mayfield
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Alison Mayfield examines the frustrations of force majeure

The common law doctrine of frustration comes into play when a contract becomes impossible to perform, or can only be performed in a way that is substantially different from what was originally set out in the contract. The effect is that the parties to the contract will be excused from further performance under the contract. However, frustration only applies in the absence of an express provision by the parties dealing with such events. Such a clause is usually called a force majeure clause.

What is force majeure?

Force majeure is literally translated as: superior forces. In common language it is an unexpected and disruptive event that may operate to excuse a party from their obligations under a contract. Force majeure is only recognised in English law if it is specifically provided for in the terms of a contract.

Why have a force majeure clause?

The purpose of a force majeure clause is to define, more or less precisely, the circumstances in which a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll