header-logo header-logo

Fixing courts ‘achievable’ & ‘vital’

25 September 2025
Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Dead seagulls and excrement-soaked floors are just two of the hazards causing delays in court buildings in the past 12 months, a Law Society report has found

The birds were found rotting in the roof insulation at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court in July. Consequently, ‘the court had to close because maggots were literally raining down onto the lobby’, according to an anonymous source quoted in the report. Elsewhere, cases have ground to a halt due to asbestos, mould, inadequate air conditioning and dilapidated toilets.

At Hull Crown Court, lawyers endured several sewage leaks in the robing room, caused by a burst pipe ‘spraying personal items, carpet and desks etc,’ an anonymous source said. ‘This was a significant health risk which led to several counsel and solicitors being very ill.’

The report, ‘State of the courts’, published this week, investigates whether the court infrastructure is fit for purpose. Almost two-thirds (63%) of solicitors surveyed have experienced delays in hearings in the past 12 months due to poor infrastructure.

One in five said the technology in the courts was ‘not at all’ fit for purpose—a 7% increase compared to the 2022 ‘State of the courts’ survey. Tech glitches included poor quality remote hearings, software problems and a lack of working plug sockets in conference rooms and the courts.

Difficulties were heightened for solicitors with a disability, due to a lack of ramps and working lifts or other accessibility limitations. 45% said the physical state of the courts are ‘not at all fit for purpose’, compared to 25% of solicitors with no disability.

Law Society president Richard Atkinson highlighted that the Crown Court backlog is about 77,000 cases, while two-thirds of care cases in family courts take longer than the 26-week time limit.

‘Behind each of these statistics are tens of thousands of adults and children who could be freed from limbo and move forward with their lives if they could have their day in court,’ Atkinson said.

‘This could be an easy win for the government, which has rightly recognised the need for capital and sustained investment in the courts but must go further.’

Issue: 8132 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll