header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms offered legal apprenticeships

Government-funded apprenticeships that will serve as “training contracts” for support staff are being rolled out in the legal sector.

Two City law firms have already expressed an interest in the scheme for their librarians and accounting staff. However, the scheme, the “Business Administration Framework (Legal Pathway)”, is available to law firms of all sizes as well as in-house legal departments and other legal services employers.

Any new staff hired under the scheme can be employed for as little as £2.50 per hour. The apprenticeships will last about nine months, are flexible and tailored to the needs of employer and employee, and are free where the employee is aged 24 or under, is a UK or EU citizen, and is not a law graduate.

Apprentices will gain a nationally recognised apprenticeship qualification, as well as a Legal Professional Qualification (LPQ) from the Institute of Paralegals. The apprenticeships are available now, and a specific pathway in legal administration will be added in April.

James O’Connell, chief executive, Institute of Paralegals, says: “This could be viewed as the first ever training contract for support staff. It offers definite outcomes, assessment, and national consistency in standards. It’s also a fantastically cheap way for firms to get staff, and on a nine-month probationary period.

“They are getting free or heavily subsidised training for their staff which leads to nationally recognised qualifications. I think it will become the normal way of hiring people.”
 

Issue: 7446 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll