header-logo header-logo

09 August 2023
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Fines hike proposed in misconduct crackdown

Legal professionals could face tougher financial penalties and heightened scrutiny, under plans put forward by super-regulator the Legal Services Board (LSB)

The LSB, which oversees all ten legal services regulators, announced last week that it will review the tools available to regulators with a view to raising the financial penalties at their disposal and enabling them to proactively gather information and share intelligence about wrongdoing.

Alan Kershaw, LSB Chair, said: ‘For some time, we have been concerned that a lack of effective fining powers among some regulators, particularly the SRA, may hamper their ability to tackle wilful and serious misconduct.’

Anna Bradley, chair, SRA Board, said: ‘We have, for some years now advocated that the SRA be given unlimited fining powers to create that deterrent more quickly.

‘While individual solicitors should face the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) for serious wrongdoing (and in appropriate cases forfeit their right to practise), that does not preclude the SRA from also fining them and their firm.’

However, the Law Society strongly opposes further hikes in penalties.

Law Society President Lubna Shuja said: ‘There is no evidence that the SRA’s current fining powers are insufficient.

‘The SRA does not exist on its own in the regulatory process. It sits alongside the SDT, which already has draconian powers to sanction any wrongdoing in the solicitors’ profession. These include not only fining powers but also the ability to remove a solicitor from the profession altogether.

‘The SDT remains the appropriate forum for serious cases of alleged misconduct. Further extending the SRA’s powers risks undermining the SDT’s role and authority and potentially reducing the sanctions imposed on bad conduct.’

The maximum penalty the SRA can impose was raised from £2,000 to £25,000 in July, 2022.

The SRA receives more than 10,000 complaints about firms and individual lawyers each year. In 2021/22, it referred 1,741 matters for investigation, resulting in 301 sanctions of which 49 were fines. It referred 76 cases of serious misconduct to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT). 

The government is currently considering increasing the maximum SRA penalty for misconduct that falls into the category of economic crime.

Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll