header-logo header-logo

A fine balance

13 March 2008 / William Chapman
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Community care , Criminal
printer mail-detail

How will a new code of practice affect the rights of money
laundering suspects? asks William Chapman
 

The government is considering responses from “stakeholders” to its proposed new code of practice for investigators under Ch 2 of Pt 8 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA 2002) issued, as required, under s 377. The code regulates the wide-ranging powers available to investigators of money laundering offences under Pt 8. The Home Office intends to publish responses within three months. The proposed code contains only minor modifications to the existing code. Some of these have been consequential amendments following amendments made to POCA 2002 by the Serious Crime Act 2007. There have been a few additions, but for the most part the consultation process has been an opportunity for comment upon the working of the existing code since POCA 2002 came into force.

 

LOWER CRIME V HUMAN RIGHTS

Those comments are likely to focus on the balance that needs to be struck between the desire of the state

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll