header-logo header-logo

26 January 2012
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Finding the remedy for implants

Law commissioner advocates breach of contract as solution to implant scandal

Breach of contract could be the best remedy for the PIP breast implants controversy, according to law commissioner David Hertzell.

About 40,000 women in the UK have PIP (Poly Implant Prosthèse) implants, which were filled with industrial-grade silicone gel instead of the more expensive medical-grade variety. French doctors have recommended their removal, and discussions are taking place in the UK over who is responsible, what should be done and what type of legal claim might be appropriate. The manufacturers of PIP implants are no longer in business.

Health secretary Andrew Lansley has indicated that women whose implants were inserted on the NHS will be offered free consultations and removal if required, and he has said private healthcare providers have a moral duty to offer the same. However, several private clinics deny responsibility.

Writing in NLJ, Hertzell argues a breach of contract claim “could be easier to prove and potentially offer more generous remedies than other types of claim”.

“Breast augmentation surgery is classified as a works and material contract because the service (the surgeon’s skill and the operation) is so substantial that it is in effect the substance of the contract: the goods (the implants) are ancillary.”

Hertzell points out that the goods supplied must be of “satisfactory quality”, and that safety is an important element of “quality”. “If goods are of unsatisfactory quality, the consumer is entitled, within a reasonable time, to a repair or replacement, unless this would be disproportionate…Here, claimants would be seeking the cost of replacement implants and surgery. It is irrelevant that the implants have not ruptured.”

Any litigation will also need to take into account the psychological implications of implant removal, according to expert witness and psychologist Hugh Koch, of Hugh Koch Associates.

Koch says needing or having implant removal can cause psychological distress in a large group of women, and that professional treatment should be sought if this does not resolve itself within a short period of time.

Issue: 7498 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll