header-logo header-logo

Financial Services Tribunal: for justice, for business confidence (Pt 2)

22 June 2018 / Michel Reznik
Issue: 7798 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7798_reznik

Michel Reznik explains why the Financial Services Tribunal will work for the financial services industry & ‘UK plc’

  • SMEs need affordable access to a primary dispute resolution forum to re-establish consumer confidence in credit markets to pre-financial crisis levels.
  • Historical examples establish that the financial industry benefits from offering its customers favourable dispute resolution terms, as they boost the market confidence that underpins economic growth.
  • The financial industry should therefore encourage government to establish a Financial Services Tribunal as a means to stimulate consumer confidence and a return to growth in SME lending.

In previous New Law Journal issues I summarised the ‘access to justice’ case for a Financial Services Tribunal (FST) made by Richard Samuel in three articles he published in the Capital Markets Law Journal . It is now well-understood and widely, if not universally, accepted that SMEs need a more accessible primary dispute resolution forum (PDR) than is afforded by the courts if they are to have a real chance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll