header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Financial services—Financial Services Authority (FSA)—Regulation of financial services

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
19 October 2012
Issue: 7534 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Emptage v Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd [2012] EWHC 2708 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 109 (Oct)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Haddon-Cave J, 11 Oct 2012

The Administrative Court has set out the principles and approach to be taken by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme Ltd, having regard, inter alia, to R v Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd, ex p Bowden [1995] 3 All ER 605

Mark Cannon QC and Can Yeginsu (instructed by Manley Turnbull Solicitors) for the claimant. Andreas Gledhill (instructed by SNR Denton UK LLP) for the FSCS.

In 2005, the claimant and her partner sought financial advice regarding their mortgage from their insurance and mortgage brokers. The advice was given by a broker whose work was authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). Following S’s advice, the claimant and her partner re-mortgaged their home by redeeming the existing repayment mortgage and taking out a fresh, larger interest only mortgage with a longer 15-year term. They used the balance to invest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Motor commissions & fiduciary duties
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
NLJ this week: The power of Interpol red notices
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Approach with caution post-Mazur
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Philip Sales is selected as next Deputy President
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Tax shock ahead for partners?
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll