header-logo header-logo

13 April 2023
Issue: 8021 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Financial orders for divorcing couples come under review

A review of financial remedy orders, which determine the division of finances at the end of marriage or civil partnership, has been announced by the Law Commission.

Financial remedy orders, governed by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 and the Civil Partnership Act 2004, can cover the transfer of property, maintenance and the splitting of pensions.

The review, announced this month, will consider whether the current law is working effectively and delivering safe and consistent outcomes for divorcing couples.

It will cover the potential for reform in specific areas, including whether judges have too much discretion over the division of financial assets and whether there should be a clear set of principles in place instead. It will ask:

  • whether courts should have wider powers to make orders for children over the age of 18;
  • how maintenance payments for an ex-spouse or civil partner should work;
  • how much consideration the courts should give to the behaviour of separating parties when making orders; and
  • the factors judges should consider when making financial remedy decisions.

The review will also look at the treatment of pensions, and structures for making regular financial payments.

Professor Nicholas Hopkins, Law Commissioner, said: ‘Fifty years since the current law was put in place, it’s essential that we look at whether it is working effectively for all parties.

‘This is a hugely important area, affecting separating couples and their children at an incredibly stressful time of their lives. It is essential that any reform in this area is very carefully considered.’

The Law Commission aims to publish a scoping paper in September 2024.

Issue: 8021 / Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll