header-logo header-logo

Finance on family breakdown

31 May 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Validity of a post-nuptial agreement

NA v MA [2006] EWHC 2900 (Fam), [2007] All ER (D) (Jan), Baron J attracted comment in the press and has already featured in NLJ. It was a truly sad story, though for once the solicitors’ profession came out of it better than the medics and the barristers. The wife (W) had discussed her anxieties with her doctor who promptly discussed them with her overbearing husband and members of the Bar seem to have done little to smooth the court’s path to judgment.

The main legal issue revolved around the efficacy of a “post nuptial agreement”, that is to say an agreement on the basis of which the parties were intended to resume cohabitation. The agreement had been negotiated whilst the parties were still in the throes of dealing with a very difficult relationship. The husband, the judge said, had offered the agreement on a “take it or leave it basis” as the only way to achieve a reconciliation in the marriage. The parties were still living together

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The threat of section 21 ‘no fault’ eviction was banished this week, after the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 passed into law
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
back-to-top-scroll