header-logo header-logo

Filing Doubles

24 January 2008
Issue: 7305 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Profession

One in two legal practitioners now submits stamp duty land tax forms online, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) says. The percentage of solicitors and conveyancers submitting forms electroni­cally has more than doubled in a year. In December 2006, 35,753 registered online—22% of all legal practitioners— but by December last year that number had increased to more than 65,000, up to 46%. A study into online filing, published this month on the HMRC website, confirms that solicitors and conveyancers feel the main benefit of online filing is that it makes “registration clear and easy”. For details of the online service see www.hmrc.gov.uk

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll