header-logo header-logo

The file? What’s that?

11 November 2016 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7722_harrison

Richard Harrison looks at modern ways of storing and accessing client information

It used to be so simple. You had a client. Who had a “matter”. For each particular matter, there was a cardboard “file”, labelled with the name of the client and the description of the matter.

There were various methods of organisation but generally you had a clip for “correspondence”: (letters in letters out, attendance notes, instructions to counsel), which would generally be in ascending chronological order. Then there was a flap for loose drafts and documents and possibly a separate folder for important documents such as contracts or pleadings.

Original court documents could be identified as such because they were sewn up with green tape. This practice gradually declined among progressive practitioners, to be superseded by the branded folded corner.

If the matter was complex or long-running, you would have several such folders or would transfer everything into nicely labelled lever-arch files.

To understand what had happened in the case previously, and its current status and future intentions, you looked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll