header-logo header-logo

22 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Figures suggest regulator tougher on black and Asian solicitors

Black and Asian solicitors are disproportionately likely to be investigated for regulatory breaches, official figures have revealed

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) published its annual report on its enforcement activities, ‘Upholding professional standards 2018/19’, this month, showing how it handled more than 9,500 reports and 3,600 investigations during 2018/19.

In total, about 18% of the solicitor population is black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME). Of concerns raised with the SRA, however, 26% related to BAME solicitors. 32% of the cases the SRA decided to investigate involved BAME solicitors. A higher proportion then proceeded to a full disciplinary hearing―35% of these involved BAME solicitors.

BAME solicitors were also more likely to go through a full hearing than have their cases resolved through an agreed outcome. 

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA, said: ‘It is a picture seen across many regulators; some of the potential factors may be wider societal issues and others may be particular to the legal sector.’ The SRA intends to commission independent research into why so many BAME solicitors are being reported.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘It is extremely concerning that black, Asian and minority ethnic solicitors continue to feature disproportionately in the numbers of complaints received about solicitors, investigations taken up by the SRA and sanctions issued by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.

‘Our recent “Race For Inclusion” report found that black, Asian and minority ethnic solicitors face barriers to progression at every stage of their career―including microaggressions, the ethnicity pay gap, and pressure to fit into a certain culture.’

Greene highlighted that the legal sector ‘stands for access to justice, equality for all and the rule of law.

‘We must ensure that within our profession, there is equality at all stages and solicitors’ chances of being complained about or investigated are not influenced by race or ethnicity’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll