header-logo header-logo

Ferry sackings cause shockwave

23 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail
P&O Ferries will face expensive legal action for firing 800 crew members with immediate effect via video call, lawyers have predicted

The Dubai-headquartered ferry operator, which sacked the workers last week without consultation, is hiring agency workers to replace the staff on lower wages. It said the action was necessary because it made losses of £100m last year. 

The RMT and Nautilus unions are considering what legal action to take. Trade union law firm Thompsons described the sackings as ‘a shocking disregard of the most basic employment law.

‘The law states that if you’re dismissing more than 20 employees, you must consult with them. The larger the number of employees being dismissed, the longer the consultation should be―up to 45 days.’

Alex Mellis, of No5 Barristers’ Chambers, said: ‘In the short term, we may well see the trade unions seek an injunction in the High Court, although we would expect to see it imminently if it were to happen at all and it is likely to enter a relatively untested area of law.

‘This would essentially force P&O to carry out the consultation with workers that should have happened.’

He said the unions could also bring a complaint to the employment tribunal for failure to provide consultation, and the tribunal could order a protective award ‘in the form of a week’s pay for a period of 90 days, dependent on the severity and egregiousness of the breach by the employer, so we could see P&O needing to pay out up to 90 days’ additional pay for all 800 employees.’

Mellis said: ‘There are also grounds for these workers to individually claim for unfair dismissal...the pay-out will be capped at a year’s salary for every employee who takes this step, which may well be a similar amount to the recently announced “enhanced” redundancy packages that have been discussed.’

Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll