header-logo header-logo

29 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fast-tracking mesothelioma claims

Government launches proposal for new compensation scheme

The government has launched a proposal for a fast-track, fixed-cost online compensation process for mesothelioma claims.

The lethal lung disease, which is caused by exposure to asbestos, often develops decades after exposure and usually kills within nine months of diagnosis. It causes approximately 2,200 deaths in the UK each year.

The new system would include a dedicated pre-action protocol for mesothelioma. The insurance industry would also set up a secure electronic information gateway, which would resemble the RTA Portal for uncontested road traffic claims. The gateway would be used where the victim knows where they were working when they were exposed to asbestos. Claimants’ legal fees would be limited by a fixed recoverable costs regime.

A Ministry of justice consultation on the proposals, Reforming mesothelioma claims, closes on 2 October. The Mesothelioma Bill, which is currently progressing through Parliament, aims to create a compulsory payment scheme for victims who cannot trace the relevant employer or liable insurer.

However, personal injury specialist at Pannone, Rachel Seaward said: “The current proposals appear to be tipped in favour of insurers.

“We have serious concerns that with pressure to disclose witness evidence prematurely there may be an adverse impact on the level of damages particularly as these are complex high value claims. These claims often have a complicated corporate history that requires in-depth investigation and research and the introduction of fixed costs is likely to prevent lawyers undertaking this work economically.

“Ultimately we have real concerns that these changes will result in more victims dying before receiving the compensation that is due to them.”

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll