header-logo header-logo

Family woes

09 October 2014
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

Family legal aid cuts are having a major impact while falling crime has made further budget cuts unnecessary, according to the Bar Council

The latest government statistics show a drop of 15,000 per quarter in the number of people receiving legal aid for family court cases, and a drop of 40,000 per quarter for family law advice.

In April 2013, when the legal aid cuts came into force, 40,090 people received representation on legal aid for civil and family matters in the quarter before, but only 23,149 people did so in the quarter following, with the bulk of cuts hitting family law. Nicholas Lavender QC, chairman of the Bar, said the latest quarterly figures showed that families facing serious issues, such as disputes concerning children, were effectively being “shut out” of the justice system.

Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll