header-logo header-logo

16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings—Interim care order—Findings of fact by judge

Re S (a child) (care order: fact finding) [2010] EWCA Civ 1363, [2010] All ER (D) 91 (Dec)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Sir Nicholas Wall P, Arden and Wilson LJJ, 7 Dec 2010

The Court of Appeal has given guidance on Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) applications in care proceedings.

Sally Bradley QC and Lindy Armitage for the authority. Sarah Singleton QC and Vicki James for the mother. Guy Swiffen for the guardian.

S was born in prison in August 2009. In November 2009, the local authority instituted care proceedings and sought an interim care order. The mother had been observed feeding the baby in a dangerous manner known as “prop feeding” on a number of occasions. When the authority learned of that, it instructed the prison authorities to call the police to separate S from her mother under a police protection order. On 11 December 2009, an interim care order was made. The judge also made a number of findings of fact which were critical of the authority.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll