header-logo header-logo

Family Procedure (Amendment) (No 2) Rules 2012 (SI 2012/1462)

13 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

The Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, r 31.17 currently provide that a registered order cannot be enforced until the time limit for appeals has expired.

Commencement date
1 July 2012

Legislation Affected

SI 2010/2955 amended


Summary

Legislative Background

The time limit for appeals is set at one or two months (two months if the person bringing the appeal is habitually resident outside the UK).

What’s Changing?

The Rules amend the Family Procedure Rules 2010, SI 2010/2955, r 31.17.

They give the court a discretion to permit urgent enforcement where necessary to secure a child’s welfare notwithstanding the general position that enforcement is suspended pending expiry of relevant appeal periods.

The amendment is necessary in order to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Health Service Executive v SC and AC, Attorney General intervening (case no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll